September 7, 2004
Name That Movie 3
Feels like a Monday, but it’s Tuesday. So come on and name that movie. Test your visual movie mastery. Here’s your screenshot:
Guesses are in the comments. Be the first to get it right! Or, guess without looking at the other comments and just test yourself.
I’ll let people guess for a while. If no one guesses the movie, I’ll add another picture later. If someone has guessed it, I’ll ring the official virtual movie-guess bell.
Posted by James at September 7, 2004 12:52 AMBlue Velvet. That's my guess
Posted by: Rui Campos at September 7, 2004 1:57 AMtwo guesses come to mind. one randomly and one by suggestion of rui. Kill Bill (randomly) or could it be Mullhouland Drive?
Posted by: ryan at September 7, 2004 9:44 AM"I'll be down in two shakes of a rabbit's tail."
Looks like Pulp Fiction to me. If so, then having watched it yesterday gave me an unfair advantage.
Posted by: Mike at September 7, 2004 9:48 AMI'd love to say "The Warriors" but the woman is the wrong skin color and the mic is too small.
Posted by: David Grenier at September 7, 2004 11:13 AMmike beat me to it... it's Uma Thurman, watching John Travolta on the inhome secority cam.
Posted by: beth at September 7, 2004 11:13 AMsecurity, even. ;)
Posted by: beth at September 7, 2004 11:15 AMI was about to put up the second picture, but now I don't have to!
It is, indeed "Pulp Fiction."
At least this one lasted a little longer than the last. Good guessing, people!
Posted by: James at September 7, 2004 11:30 AMDamn! Late post!
Posted by: Patti M. at September 7, 2004 12:25 PMTruthfully, I was just looking for a reason to say "Long live the new flesh."
Just released on DVD, according to the Boston Sunday Globe. http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2004/09/05/videodrome_thrills_with_its_prescient_vision/
Good movie.
Posted by: Patti M. at September 7, 2004 12:28 PMWhile Nancy Banks Smith is indeed an art critic (for The Guardian), I doubt she has any interest in a 99-cent Propecia pill.
Nancy's page on The Guardian website:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/critic/archive/0,1169,1187774,00.html
Posted by: Patti M. at October 12, 2004 2:09 PM