Some have said that Bush will never get rid of Rumsfeld because it would be like firing himself.
It seems to me to make a lot more sense to the gut-feeling part of me that the reason Bush has to keep Rumsfeld is that he’s keeping his options open on attacking Iran. I think Bush would be hard pressed to find someone else to go along with his wacky schemes. Rumsfeld’s easy. He likes to experiment with the military.
Does that make you nervous?Posted by James at April 22, 2006 7:49 AM