Congressional Hopeful Blames Troubles On The Devil
Jacob says that since he decided to run for Congress, Satan has disrupted his business deals, preventing him from putting as much money into the race as he had hoped.
Clearly nutty. But it got me thinking: who would have more of a chance getting elected to the presidency, an atheist or someone who goes around blaming the devil (out loud) for everything?
Posted by James at June 24, 2006 7:17 PMObviously an the devil-blamer would have more of a chance.
Posted by: Chuck S. at June 25, 2006 12:13 AMClearly the Devil-blamer.
But which one would the Devil back?
Posted by: Bull at June 25, 2006 2:32 AMOh, that's easy. The answer is the same!
The devil wouldn't mind being a scapegoat if it helped his man get into office. He doesn't shy away from bad press.
Posted by: James at June 25, 2006 9:24 AMAboslutely the nutcase, er devil- blamer. Sorry that just slipped out. I agree about the devil backing the devil blamer also. What good is a guy (or gal but then her chances would be even lower)that doesn't believe in you?
Posted by: B.O.B. (bob) at June 27, 2006 8:15 AM