Transforming social welfare into conversion therapy was Bush's design when he made faith-based initiatives the priority of his administration's domestic agenda. And his success has been astounding.
Before Bush upended things, religious groups had always been enlisted by government as providers of social services. They just had to wholly separate their religious mission from their government-funded services. Under Bush, there has been substantial blurring of the line.
As to hiring, the law always allowed religious groups to discriminate on religious grounds - so that the Catholic Church could hire Catholic priests, for example - but that exemption did not extend to employees hired with public funds to provide social welfare. It was a simple, clear rule. If you took public money, you hired on the basis of merit, not piety.
But Bush wiped away this calibrated distinction by issuing a series of executive orders early in his presidency approving taxpayer financed religious discrimination.
asking for list of churches she attended over the last 10 years and the name of her present minister. Lown says she was told that indicating "not applicable" was not an option.There's a rude awakening for you.
"This report shows that the Bush administration has sent billions of taxpayer dollars to religious organizations without accountability for how that money is spent," said Stark [...]
The GAO report found that federal agencies administering the faith-based initiative are not informing religious organizations of their anti-discrimination responsibilities under the law. [...]
The GAO report also found that 70 percent of the agencies it reviewed did not provide information on permissible hiring practices to grantees. [...]
[F]ive years into the initiative, the GAO report finds that the government has not examined whether programs administered by religious organizations are improving participant outcomes. According to the study, agencies have not completed - or even begun - outcome-based evaluations of most of the faith-based programs they fund. [...]
It also concerns me that once the pork barrel is filled, suddenly the Church of Scientology, the Jehovah Witnesses, the various and many denominations and religious groups--and I don?t say those words in a pejorative way--begin applying for money--and I don?t see how any can be turned down because of their radical and unpopular views. I don?t know where that would take us.
The road to Hell is full ofYou go, religious guy!)goodpeople.
Well, you know, America *is* a Christian nation. Everyone celebrates Christmas. Therefore they *should* get the lion's share of the money. ::rolleyes::
Posted by: briwei at August 16, 2006 2:38 PMBrian, at least you have a religion. What about people like me?
A couple years ago I was taking courses on ASL. Part of the "homework" was that I had to attend three signed events, and one of the only ones I could make was a signed service at a UU church.
I was surprised. We sang about peace and freedom, the sermon was about equality and justice, and it was really nice and non-God focused.
I came home and said to Bob, "If the government ever mandates that we must have a religion, I could live with the UUs."
He said the UU church would most definitely not be on the list, being the big ole bunch of Lefties that they are...
: )
Posted by: Patti M. at August 16, 2006 2:55 PM