August 31, 2007

The Stance on Craig

Unless you've been a cave in Afghanistan for the past few, you've heard about Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig (R) and his bathroom courtship rituals.

Is it just me, or does it seem like a Republican Senator can't solicit homosexual sex in a public place anymore without getting plastered all over the news? And don't we have any runaway brides to report on?

I'm cutting to the chase on this one. People who think that Larry was just possibly misunderstood (and there are those people) are full of baloney. The police have now released the tape that they made when questioning GOP Senator Craig and you can hear the frustration in the police officer's voice when Craig refuses to be honest in his description of the lengths he went to to make it clear to the undercover officer that he was soliciting sex.

Craig touched his foot to the officer's foot in the next stall. He reached under the stall with his opposite hand (the officer saw his wedding ring) and rubbed his hand along the underside of a stall.

In all my years of public restroom behavior, I've never had someone touch their foot to mine or stick their hand under the stall (or peer at me for minutes through the crack, as Craig says he did). These are highly irregular activities for a guy in a public restroom. Most male bathroom behavior is antisocial, so this stuff stands out. Craig was soliciting sex, he was not misunderstood, and he is lying to the police officer on the tape.

Is soliciting sex in a restroom a crime? I'll let more legal-minded folks debate that one, but probably not. To quote Dale Carpenter on the Volokh Conspiracy blog:

What really seems to have happened is that the airport police had received complaints about sexual activity and were acting over-zealously to deter it, regardless of the niceties of state criminal law.

A court will decide. Do I fault the police for trying to keep sexual encounters out of the public bathroom? These are the bathrooms we send our children into. And, frankly, I already don't like public restrooms -- I don't want the added fun of walking into a sexual buffet. I don't mind the police discouraging this behavior any more than I would mind the police discouraging some guy in the ladies room touching his foot to my wife's, peering at her through the space in the door and propositioning her under the wall between stalls. Do you think people feel safe alone in a bathroom when this kind of behavior goes unchecked?

As Tucker Carlson showed us this week, you're a lot safer being picked up by the police than if people take the matter into their own hands. Tucker "I'm Not Gay, Just a Gay-Basher" Carlson admitted to having been solicited in a bathroom, and then returning with his friends to bust some heads. (Literally, busting his head against the stall wall) Oh, and apparently this is what passes for humor on MSNBC.

I do have some sympathy for Craig, for the conservative hole he's dug himself into, even though he dug it for himself. Only the looniest can stick by this guy. Cheating on your wife with random strangers in airport bathrooms makes Bill Clinton's activities look like high school antics. My sympathy is more like pity.

The ironic, hypocritical sin is that Craig's public activities have been efforts to reinforce the elements of society that have pushed some homosexual activity underground where it remains secret but becomes dangerous (especially if you run into Tucker Carlson). And the people who he stood with are running away from him as fast as they can. Why? Because the Republicans rely on wedge issues like gay rights to pry their constituents away from Democrats who are more consistent in their beliefs and actions. Political gay bashing is a gamble that's becoming dangerous as people see the hypocrisy behind the Republican straighter-than-thou agenda and as they re-examine their assumptions. (See Iowa's recent ruling allowing gay marriages Yes - Iowa)

Craig is definitely getting some cosmic karma applied directly to his hypocrisy. Sometimes, gambling on hatred wins you an election. Sometimes it turns what could have been a quiet incident into a national issue.

Posted by James at August 31, 2007 9:19 AM
Create Social Bookmark Links
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.drmomentum.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1870

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Stance on Craig:

» Idaho Senator Larry Craig to resign from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
Republican sources say the senator will resign Saturday amid furor over his arrest and guilty plea i [Read More]

Tracked on August 31, 2007 8:49 PM
Comments

Don't forget another issue -- legalized prostitution. If prostitution were legalized, then this guy wouldn't be wiggling his fingers under bathroom stalls, and nobody would have found out about his extramarital activities.

Of course he's apologized -- for pleading guilty. Jackass.

And that thing about Tucker Carlson is so offensive I don't even know where to begin. Imus was fired? That's sticks and stones compared to this confessed hate-crime-perp.

Posted by: Maggie at August 31, 2007 10:40 AM

Oh, sorry, a P.S. Carlson's such a badass hetero that he had to run away, enlist a friend, and then sneak back into a bathroom to beat this poor guy up? That's the definition of macho.

Posted by: Maggie at August 31, 2007 10:42 AM

Believe it or not, with respect to "Clenis," some people still cling to the idea that "she could have been a spy and he would have told her secrets."

Well, ditto Craig, except for one thing. It's clear enough that Clinton didn't have to tell any secrets to get what he wanted. In fact, it was all he could do to fend women off. Craig, on the other time, had to wiggle his fingers... god only knows what else he would have done. ;-)

Posted by: Julie at August 31, 2007 11:41 AM

On the other HAND... sorry... too much coffee

Posted by: Julie at August 31, 2007 11:43 AM

Maybe your brain tried to block the double meaning.

Posted by: James at August 31, 2007 11:50 AM

"Democrats who are more consistent in their beliefs and actions?" It's not difficult to be consistent when you say that private life should remain private. As in, "I don't believe I have the right to know or dictate what you do in private." It's also not difficult to be consistent when you say you hold our espouse freedoms in high regard, and you don't contradict yourself by trying to restrict how consenting adults live their lives.

Then again, public decorum should prevent anyone from flirting in a public bathroom. It's one thing to flirt in a bar, where one can assume that someone alone might entertain an offer of companionship. It's another thing all together to have someone flirt with you when you are taking care of nature's business. Yuck!

Posted by: Kitten Herder at August 31, 2007 11:35 PM

LOL. I discussed this with my parents last night, and the discussion came to: where do they conclude their business? Talk about yuck. Nothing makes you feel sexier than a public restroom, eh?

Posted by: Maggie at September 1, 2007 9:38 AM

I was at lunch with some friends as we were listening to the tape of this asshat. We couldn't stop laughing. I mean, how absurd was that? "I have a wide stance" and "I was picking up a piece of toilet paper"?!? Yeah, both of those things happen in the real world.

I was listening to a radio station out here that does some of that morning comedy format. They played a song parody about Senator Craig. I can't find a link to it, but it was a parody of Glory Days. Any care to guess the title and then say Ewwwwww?

Posted by: briwei at September 4, 2007 12:04 PM

Oh, and regarding Tucker. Come on. Isn't that the normal response when someone you don't find appealing tries to pick you up? Admit it Maggie. When guys hit on you, you go get James and some of his tough friends and they beat the guys ass.

(For those who don't know us all, that last paragraph is a sublime blend of sarcasm and absurdity.)

Posted by: briwei at September 4, 2007 12:07 PM

I think Tucker exaggerated what actually happened because he thought it sounded tough and funny, the morons on air with him also thought it sounded tough and funny, and then later some lawyer whacked him on the head. I'd like to see him arrested for committing a hate crime, though.

Posted by: Maggie at September 4, 2007 3:47 PM

Copyright © 1999-2007 James P. Burke. All Rights Reserved