Maggie and I watched Ang Lee's Lust, Caution last night. My first comment is that this is definitely not a date movie for most people.
It tells the tale of a WWII-era Chinese theatrical-troupe with a patriotic bent, and the consequences once their patriotism becomes vigilante fervor.
Wong Chia Che is a college freshman who has been abandoned by her surviving family. her modesty about her acting ability does not stop the drama society from recruiting her, and it soon becomes clear that she has a natural talent in speaking to the hearts of her audience, engaging them in patriotic fervor and loosening their purse strings for the cause. Wong is a student of American films; she sits in the dark and absorbs the emotions which later become fuel for her own performances.
When the taste of that power becomes too strong for Kuang, the drama society's zealous leader, he turns the attention of the group to plans that are significantly more challenging and dangerous. Wong becomes central to their plans, directed by a resistance leader with a longtime grudge against a Japanese collaborator.
The film becomes increasingly disturbing, since the troupe are over their heads, but Wong is the only one with emotionally and physically damaging exposure.
Without family, we create our own family through the friends we choose to surround us. Wong's situation is stressed a number of times when she speaks of her abandonment, when she gives up hope of being reunited with her father who has fled the country with her favored brother, and much later when she is living with what are, perhaps, distant relatives who care nothing of her comings and goings.
Seeing herself through Kuang's eyes proves to be a strong motivating force for her, but has she chosen a brave patriot or a cowardly hothead? The answer becomes obvious fairly early on in her mission. Her target is an extremely cautious (and violently lustful) official. Wong does what she can to preserve what's left of her own personality while immersed in the role that her mission requires. But it's unclear whether she's waiting for Kuang to redeem himself, or for something else. That personality may have given up hope of her father ever returning to "save" her, but is still waiting for someone to fulfill that role.
The forces of revolution and resistance take a back seat to the confused emotions of a girl who has never truly had anyone on her side. What is patriotism, anyway, without family? And if you define a family, as I do, by love, then what is patriotism without love?
The trailer can be seen here. This film is rated NC-17 for violence and violent, explicit sex. I found it to be an engrossing film, often confusing in its character's motivations, but thoroughly depressing throughout.
Posted by James at June 5, 2008 9:38 AMHere is a trailer:
http://www.focusfeatures.com/viewer.php?f=lust_caution&c=trailer&ext=mov&w=480&h=260
The sweet music doesn't jibe with the violence for me. I would compare this movie to The Pianist. The trailer makes it look like it's sweet and gentle and everybody's feelings and motives and convictions are crystal clear. I think the movie was a lot more realistic and better than that -- but I never want to see it again in my life. The trailer makes it look comfortable. It's agonizing.
Posted by: Maggie at June 5, 2008 11:32 AMInteresting that you liked the film on the whole, but you "never want to see it again in [your] life."
I feel the exact same way about "Schindler's List." Great movie, but I don't need to see it again.
I thought of seeing "Lust, Caution," and now I just might have to rent it. Thanks to you both.
Posted by: Patti M. at June 5, 2008 12:09 PMYou can watch it when I'm not around. I don't need to watch depressing movies. Real life is plenty depressing thank you very much. I like my movies (and books lately) to be escapist. I want to enjoy those 2 hours not be depressed by them.
Great movies I don't ever need to see again:
Schindler's List
Apocalype Now
Deer Hunter
I'm sure there are more but those came to mind immediately.
Posted by: B.O.B. (bob) at June 5, 2008 12:25 PMExactly, Bob. Afterwards I said to James, "I don't want to watch any more depressing movies." I had recovered by this morning, I think. The Pianist, on the other hand, gave me nightmares literally for weeks. In one nightmare I killed somebody. It was awful.
I haven't seen any of the three movies you reference. They can go on my list "for when the world is so perfect it's almost funny that human nature was ever so awful." I don't think I'll ever be watching movies on that list.
Patti, I wouldn't exactly say I liked it -- I thought it was a good movie. But it really was agonizing to watch at many points in the movie. I did find myself caring about some of the characters, others were too complex and evil or too cowardly to like, but you could sympathize with them at times.
Posted by: Maggie at June 5, 2008 12:36 PMI know why those movies came to mind for you so quickly--because I like two of them. You're a rat bastard.
Coppola's wife filmed the making of "Apocalypse Now," ("Hearts of Darkness - A Filmmaker's Apocalypse")and that I do not need to see again, specifically the scene where they cut the LIVE bull in thirds, realize it didn't go perfectly for the shot, so they cut ANOTHER LIVE BULL in thirds.
(shudder)
Posted by: Patti M. at June 5, 2008 12:43 PMThat's a lot of bull.
Posted by: James at June 5, 2008 1:29 PMYes well Heart of Darkness was on my do not watch under any circumstances list as is Europa, Europa from what you've told me.
Posted by: B.O.B. (bob) at June 5, 2008 1:38 PM"Europa Europa" was a good movie, but not one I see myself watching again. I'm glad I watched it.
It won many awards and was nominated for many more: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099776/awards
Movie info: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099776/
Posted by: Patti M. at June 5, 2008 2:09 PM